TARIFFS,
TRADE AND WHEAT
TEJINDER NARANG
Traders are a smarter lot. They speculate and
exploit each and every opportunity. Traders cannot be more thankful when the
government gives them a reason to cheer. Sometimes rumors of imposition of
higher import tariffs, intended to protect domestic producers and restrict
cheaper imports, can also help traders in some ways. At the same time higher
MSP meant to help farmers, gives an immediate advantage to the trade because
market prices move up right away even through new crop will arrive in next
April.
Wheat is a case in a point, where policymakers
have been frequently fiddling with custom duty to regulate imports to maintain
supply-demand balance. To be precise import duty has been changed seven times
since August 2015. Thus, such a rapid frequency of tariff treatments give rise
market gossip that is treated with a spark of truth.
A steady flow of wheat import during last three
years by the private trade/MNCs caters to private demand of country—mostly in
southern states—while the central pool managed by FCI from annual local
procurement of about 23-33 million tons (mts) is stored, and then used for
Public Distribution System (PDS). FCI stocks declined to about 8 million tons (mts)
on 1st April2017 when buffer requirement is 7.5 mts.
Recently media widely reported that authorities
are considering yet another hike—eighth alteration- in import duty from
existing level of 10% to 20%-25%. The very speculation in anticipated duty
structure has lifted the price of imported wheat—sourced mostly from
Russia/Ukraine-- from Rs 17500/ton to Rs 18500/ton ex Tuticorin. It made
importers smile with money in their pockets, because before this rumor mill,
they were unable to dispose of imported stocks for want of parity—that is their
landed cost was marginally higher than local values or they were fearing
losses. Importers who either diverted or cancelled their wheat cargos on the
basis of this hearsay may have regretted. (Reports of about 0.3mt having been
cancelled/diverted are circulating in the market) This surge by Rs 1000/mt will also assist
local farmers, carrying old stocks, to sell grain at better values.
What gives further credence to this speculation
is that Government needs to encourage more sowing of wheat by the farmers in
this Rabi season on the ideas of realizing better market values for their crop
next year (marketing tear 2018-19). Secondly wheat inflation is in the negative
zone (see chart) for last four months—about minus 1.71 in September 2017-and
thus additional duty will be virtually neutral to macro inflation.
New MSP of wheat has been notified at Rs
17350/ton—higher by Rs1100/ton from previous year. If Government now actually inflates duty by
10% -- scaling it to 20%-- trade will factor in the MSP, raised by about 7.2%,
that will elevate local prices also. For importers, tariff increase of 10%
would be substantially offset by higher MSP and make imports during
December2017-February 2018 viable.
It is quite possible that by December 2017,
Government may again reduce duty to nil or revert to 10%--the ninth time modification-- to once
more facilitate import because trade is aware that maximum pressure on
reduction in official stocks starts from December onwards because farmers are
left with little grains with them.
Though government maintains 2017-18 production at 97 mts, some section
in the trade peg output at 92-93 mts. Proponents of the alternative view
foresee another import wave of wheat after December 2017 of additional
1mt—making it total of 2.2 mt in 2017-18. However, International Grain Council,
London estimates that India might import 4 mt in 2017-18 against 6 mt last
year)based upon its projection of annual wheat consumption of 100mt.
The fluctuating pattern of duty determination
is amply suitable for MNCs (Multinational Corporations) rather than local
importers who are India centric. MNCs can take an advance position at the
origins—Russia/Ukraine/Australia etc.—at cheaper cost for forward months. In
the event of disparity in local market directly when delivery period is
approaching or if there is a non-viability in sale price triggered by tariffs—they
can divert the cargo to nearby destinations like Bangladesh, Sri-Lanka, UAE, and
Oman etc. MNCs also have expertise in hedging their position in international
future stock exchanges like CBOT to minimize losses.
Indian
importers and flour millers lack both financial muscle and proficiency in
hedging. In 2016-17 Indian wheat import was about $1.27 billion –Australia $525
mill; Ukraine$603mill, Russia$33mill; others 107mill. Trade expects much higher
flows from Russia after December 2017 of 11.5% protein crop than from other
countries.
OMSS price of Rs 17950/ton ex -Panjab costs
more than Rs 20000/ton in southern states after accounting for freight and
incidentals. Should international prices remain within $220 cif/mt or so,
higher duties may not have the effect of blocking the exports. (see chart).
Government will do well not to release excessive
stocks from the central pool in the market because FCI/agencies have to assure
adequacy of reserves and buffer norms. There are reports of moisture stress in
Rajasthan and MP in this Rabi season and attaining production of 100 mts in
marketing year 2018-19 will be a challenge; and so will be the realizing
procurement target of 33 mts next year.
No comments:
Post a Comment