DILEMMA
OF DUTIES ON EDIBLE OIL, SUGAR AND WHEAT
(WHY
NOT APPLY “ALGO” APPLICATION)
TEJINDER
NARANG
Three
agro-commodities namely— edible oils, sugar and wheat-- are engaging immediate
attention of the government with respect to custom/import duties. Reasons--
their prices abroad are much lower than in India. Domestic production of edible
oil by oilseed crushing / refining units and sugar by sugar mills will stand to
lose if duty free import is permitted or insufficient duty is applied while
farmers will suffer if duty free import of wheat is authorized. (Why prices
abroad are lower and higher in India, is not the narrative of this article)
Thus
government provides stakeholders (including farmers) protection by making
imports expensive. Current duty on crude/refined oil varies 7.5% to 20%;
sugar is 50%; wheat import at 10%. “Import demand” for edible oil varies
between 65%-70% (see chart) of annual consumption, imported sugar requirement
is about 2% of local production this year and wheat import is about 4-6% of
domestic output.
At the
same time, government is obliged to shield consumers by discouraging
inefficient production and processing.
EDIBLE
OIL
Edible
oil industry has represented that import duty may be increased to 20% on crude
oil- specially crude palm oil(CPO)-(from
current 7.5%) and 35% on refined oil ( from current max 20%) to support crush parity so that local prices
of oils may rise while oil meal exports become viable. Prices of palm and soy
oil are interlinked or to say the spread between the two has a relationship
–that is if CPO values go up domestically or abroad, a definitive upswing takes
place in soy oil and others soft oils as well.
A chart of declining trend in the local crude
palm oil prices in rupees/10kg is show cased, which implies that realization of
oil seed farmers could drift down. Currently oilseeds prices fetch 10-15%
below MSP for soybean, rapeseed and ground nut while last year market prices
were higher by 20-25% than MSP.
Industry
also espouses case of farmers for future growth of oilseed production. However
when there is 65%-70% “import dependency” on edible oil, then a very large
section of consumers, including farmers, are exposed to oil inflation with
elevated duty. Authorities will have to rationalize whether hike in duty will
be justified so far as consumers are concerned.
About
2 million tons of oil is transiting either at ports/custom bonding or in the
pipeline. It will be bonanza for those
who are positioned for these stocks. But that is how market operates.
SUGAR
Government
raised duty on sugar from 40 to 50% on 9th July 2017 to isolate
local prices from possibility of cheaper imports. Domestic prices naturally
soared. But around third week of July Government has written to industry as to
why prices of sugar have flared up!! When the raison d'etre of hiking
duty was to keep local prices firmer, then officialdom needs introspection of
their own actions. Moreover August/September period is tail end of sugar
season and prices shall spike anyway.
Range
of the duty varies from 0% to 50% as pictured below. In last 6 years, duty is
modified 6 times!! Incorrigibility/ sensitivity of sugar market is such
that, in April 2017 “duty free” import of 0.5 mts of sugar was authorized, but
in July2017 duty was enhanced from “40%
to 50% to curb imports”.
WHEAT
Accompanying
graphic displays flip-flop on wheat duty. In a span of less than three years,
duty is notified seven times. It demonstrates predicament of policymakers in
deciding quantum of duty and applicability of its duration. Importers of wheat
remain nervous of any abrupt change in duty structure. With rising demand
wheat import is likely to be a long term proposition.
“ALGO” IS THE REMEDY
Above
illustrations indicate that duty determination is a very challenging exercise. Market
volatility and pressure groups can create arbitrariness in fixing the
percentage of import duty and the duration of applicability.
At a
time when PSD(production supply and demand) data, duties/tariffs and price
movements are known internationally and nationally, Government may create an
algorithmic application (ALGO) that can give transparent guidance-- to
Government and the industry-- to trigger duty changes, up or down,—so that
objectivity is maintained.
ALGO
programming is wide spread in commodity and other stock exchanges. ALGO
can perform calculations, data processing and automated reasoning tasks including decidability through computers at
electronic speed based on input and output requirements. Why not apply ALGO for
import/export duties also? Any well-known IT company can come up with
computational process—if authorities take a call.
International
and domestic prices can be tracked through commodity exchanges while each price
tick signifies mutations in supply/demand including weather related issues.
Government can predefine its target of high and low prices in domestic market
or align them with MSP to regulate imports by duty or prohibition of imports by
analyzing overseas prices through speed of ALGO. Each commodity will have well
configured ALGO and that will remain in public domain. Inputs and outputs of
such an ALGO would be available on real time basis to all and sundry on the
website.
Lobbying
by association or groups will then be minimal. Even farmers will have
satisfaction of rational decision making process. Though no system may be
perfect but algorithmic guidance will have less imperfections. Of course
government may have final word on percentage of duty to be levied but then
basis of duty determination/ any deviations thereof or discretions applied to
the guidance of ALGO, will be known to one and all.
No comments:
Post a Comment