CLICK LINK BELOW
http://epaper.
ORYZA REPORT AUTHORED BY ME.
WITH “LEVY RICE”
REDUCED TO 25%-- GOVT SAVES Rs 24000 CRORES PER ANNUM
================================================
ABOUT 10 MILLION TONS OF EXTRA MARKET AVAILABLITY WILL SOFTEN RICE
PRICES; INCENTIVIZE EXPORTS.
Food Ministry has recently
directed major paddy growing states of non –basmati rice to limit “levy” to
maximum of 25% from earlier notified percentage of 30%-75%. In nut-shell,
quantum of rice procured on Government account will be restricted. This indeed is a very progressive step for surplus
availability of rice in the market and consistent with WTO obligations of
lowering public stock holdings and reduction in food subsidies. Though
Government may be taking hard position at WTO, it appears to work for WTO
compliance.
This levy reduction order will
make open market rice cheaper; food inflation will be moderated; quality
improvisation will take place; exports prices will be lower and non- basmati
rice export will be incentivized. Pressure
on FCI and state governments for creating storage space will lessen.
In Kharif marketing season (KMS)
commencing 1st October 2014 and till 21.07.2014, FCI procured 31
million tons of rice (fig 1) in two
different modes; 11 million tons is sourced from Panjab/ Haryana as custom
milled rice (CMR); balance 20 million tons is purchased as “levy rice” from
other states. Under CMR, paddy is procured by FCI/state
government agencies from farmers at MSP and thereafter processed into rice by
FCI making payment of tolling charges to millers. Under levy rice system,
farmers sell paddy to millers at MSP, and then millers sell a fixed percentage
(now directed at 25%) as levy to states as per predetermined prices of rice.
FIG 1
Less procurement of
10 million tons
This existing system (CMR+
30%-75%levy) has led to over procurement, overstocking, wastage/deterioration,
excessive involvement of central funds, higher subsidies. Reduction in levy to 25% will correct the systemic
deficiencies. Fig 2 ,
shows “excess” availability of about 10 million tons in the market when
25% levy orders are enforced. One can surmise that Food Ministry is now
targeting at a procurement of about 21-22 million tons in 2014-15, from 31
million tons in 2013-14. At acquisition cost Rs 24000/metric ton (FCI website)—procurement
of 31 million tons amounts to whopping of Rs 74400 crores. The corresponding savings by reduced procurement of 10million tons will
be Rs. 24000 crores.
FIG 2
Concerns of small millers
Since Chhattisgarh, AP, Orissa
and Telengana are the most affected regions, small rice millers in these states
may protest against such directions because they are denied assured purchases
by the states. Small units will now have to undertake marketing directly for
whatever quality they process or sell through exporters or undertake export
directly. Millers with outdated processing technology may have to modernise for
meeting market expectations/specifications. As the intention is to eventually abolish the
levy system, Centre may have to get over the resistance exerted by these
stakeholders.
Another argument that farmers will be denied
MSP if they deal with private millers, carries little merit. India produces
about 160 mill tons of paddy (eq to 106mill tons of rice), while only 47
million tons of paddy (eq. to 31 milled rice) is handled by FCI/government
agencies. The fact being (160-47) =113 million tons of paddy is bargained
directly by farmers. Thus debate on this issue is not maintainable. Should in any year there is widespread
procurement of paddy below MSP, Centre can authorise an ad-hoc intervention to
stabilise the price to MSP as is done in the case of maize.
Exports eased
India’s 40% of non-basmati rice
(about 2.5 million tons) is shipped out of Andhra Pradesh’s (AP) port of
Kakinada. AP requires evidence of servicing levy (currently 75%) of “release certificates”
(RC) from their Civil Supplies Corporation before authorising export shipments.
In June-July2014, exporters of
Non-Basmati rice could not obtain such “Release Certificate” as AP government
was not willing to accept compliance of levy obligations done by millers in the
newly created state of Telengana. This resulted into loss/ loss of profit owing
to purchasing expensive rice from Chhattisgarh and payment of demurrage on the
vessels. Buyers either deferred future business or diverted to Thailand. By mitigation
of levy to 25%, such instances may be rare.
Threat of
Thailand or Vietnam lowering their quotes of non- basmati rice and affecting Indian
exports too gets minimized. Indian rice prices may soon be seen in bearish mode
because the sentiment of extra supplies in the near future will prevail in the
market.
FIG 3—COMPILATION DATA OF FIG 2
PERCENTAGE OF LEVY
RICE TO BE DELIVERED IN STATES/UTs UNDER LEVY ORDERS DURING KMS 2011-12.
Sl.
No.
|
Name of the
State/UTs
|
Category |
Quantum
of Levy
|
1.
|
2.
|
3.
|
4.
|
1.
|
ANDHRA PRADESH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
2.
|
ASSAM
|
MILLERS
|
50%
|
3.
|
BIHAR
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%.
|
4.
|
CHHATISGARH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
5.
|
DELHI
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
6.
|
GUJARAT
|
MILLERS
|
50%
|
7.
|
HARYANA
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
8.
|
HIMACHAL PRADESH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
9.
|
JAMMU & KASHMIR
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
10.
|
JHARKHAND
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
11.
|
KARNATAKA
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
33.33%
|
12.
|
MADHYA PRADESH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
30%
|
13.
|
MAHARASHTRA
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
30%
|
14.
|
NAGALAND
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
15.
|
ORISSA
|
MILLERS
|
75%
|
16
|
PUNJAB
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
17.
|
RAJASTHAN
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
18.
|
TAMIL NADU
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
30%
|
19.
|
UTTAR PRADESH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
60%
|
20.
|
UTTARAKHAND
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
21.
|
WEST BENGAL
|
MILLERS/Wholesalers
|
50%
|
22.
|
CHANDIGARH
|
MILLERS/DEALERSMMM
|
75%
|
23
|
PUDUCHERRY
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
*******
PERCENTAGE OF LEVY RICE TO BE DELIVERED IN STATES/UTs UNDER LEVY ORDERS
DURING KMS 2012-13.
Sl.
No.
|
Name of the
State/UTs
|
Category |
Quantum
of Levy
|
1.
|
2.
|
3.
|
4.
|
1.
|
ANDHRA PRADESH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
2.
|
ASSAM
|
MILLERS
|
50%
|
3.
|
BIHAR
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%.
|
4.
|
CHHATISGARH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
5.
|
DELHI
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
6.
|
GUJARAT
|
MILLERS
|
50%
|
7.
|
HARYANA
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
8.
|
HIMACHAL PRADESH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
9.
|
JAMMU & KASHMIR
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
10.
|
JHARKHAND
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
11.
|
KARNATAKA
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
33.33%
|
12.
|
MADHYA PRADESH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
30%
|
13.
|
MAHARASHTRA
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
30%
|
14.
|
NAGALAND
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
15.
|
ORISSA
|
MILLERS
|
75%
|
16
|
PUNJAB
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
17.
|
RAJASTHAN
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
18.
|
TAMIL NADU
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
30%
|
19.
|
UTTAR PRADESH
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
60%
|
20.
|
UTTARAKHAND
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
75%
|
21.
|
WEST BENGAL
|
MILLERS/Wholesalers
|
50%
|
22.
|
CHANDIGARH
|
MILLERS/DEALERSMMM
|
75%
|
23
|
PUDUCHERRY
|
MILLERS/DEALERS
|
50%
|
*******
So informative sir...thank you
ReplyDelete