Tejnder Narang
The process of approval of Indian “Food Security Bill” in the lower
house of Parliament on 26th August 2013 must be cited as a classical
case to emphasize contradictions in psyche of human behaviour. In all
management institutes—be it Harvard, Wharton, IIMs or elsewhere and even the
student of economics at Oxford, Cambridge, and all universities must study the
“Principle Of Political Convenience” as practiced by the Indian polity.
a.
Methodical madness is a profession in politics. Voting may
be opposite to whatever is professed publicly or on the floor of parliament.
b. Can anti-
reform policies be lauded as reform because it suits vote bank politics? (Oxymoronic
views are popular indeed.)
c. Since democracy
runs on majority, even if it is 50.1% and minority as 49.9% --the former is
right and the latter wrong. Herd mentality must prevail!!
d. Life is an
event of irrationality. Voices of sanity (eminent economists/scientists) have
to be ignored in politics by forgetting righteousness of personal beliefs.
e. Can all poor be
defined hungry as well?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The economic rationale and viability of Indian Food Security Bill was questioned
and challenged with vociferous concerns by almost all national parties in
public, media and parliament. At around 11 pm on 26th August, this
bill was approved with massive majority in the Lower House of Indian
Parliament. This was a classic case of a
mobocracy fearing that its formal opposition could lead to negative electoral
consequences even if it amounted to guillotining vital national interest of
fiscal management, straining Indian economy into a messy domain, and putting at
stake productiveness of human endeavor and dignity. Even the main opposition
party (BJP) gave a muted resistance to its passage.
The dissenters could have walked out as they routinely do in other
political squabbles but did not, as if some sort of backdoor deal was struck.
Is this the right paradigm of supremacy
of Parliamentary Democracy?? Does it exists all over the world or is peculiar
to the Indian polity?? Has the opposition purposely colluded with the ruling
party to bring the national economy to its knees? Blame game can then be
shifted to UPA, while BJP benefits electorally.
ERRONEOUS ACT
Is it not an erroneous Act of granting merely “right” to food for
5kg/month of cereals (wheat, rice, corn) with 90%
subsidization (Rs. 3-2-1/kg respectively) to 67% (about 800 million) of
Indian population --though officially (World Bank norms) only 22% are poor and when the systematic leakages are 50% and costs
to rise annually?? And all poor are not hungry. (Statistically India has 1%
hungry and poverty has diminished by about 15% in last eight years).
The responsibility of implementation is given to FCI/ State Governments
who have been found wastefully wanting in its implementation for last 50 years.
Yes this is a “right for food” that a hungry
stomach can claim through extended litigation in a court. Allegorically, climb
the Mount Everest to fetch butter?? Laughable indeed.
The food subsidy is stated to be $20 billion by the Government while it
is believed to be $40 billion annually, during the next three years as per the
Government's own agro –economists Dr. Ashok Gulati. The posterity may have to a
very high price for this grossly flawed Act. The very next day—27th August2013-
stock market saluted down by 600 points and Indian rupee depreciated by 3%. This
was the real verdict and response to the parliamentary action.
But at macro level it is indicative of harsh realities of Life—
1
Democracy means 50.1% as majority vs 49.9% as minority.
2
Majority is morality; minority is immorality.
3
Herd mentality is much more powerful than
righteousness—despite being aware of what is right.
4
Logic and rationality is subservient to greed of power
and pelf.
5
Understanding this unreasonableness is the norm of right
sensibilities for perpetuating personal power.
6
Voices of sanity (of eminent economists) have to be
ignored in the science of politics and polls.
7
Immediate gains (electoral) are important than long terms
side effects (unsustainable fiscal deficit). For example-- curing cold
instantly with a wrongly prescribed medicine with irreversible asthmatic effects
is accepted.
8
Misleading the impoverished is deemed acceptable by
projecting an illusion of prosperity.
9
Telling the people that they are poor, while they are
not, is a passion of compassion.
The passage of the bill has sent shock waves to all who believed Indian
economy is out of the tentacles of socialist thinking. Liberalization of Indian
economy stands perversely reversed at the peril of not only middle and upper
classes of Indian society, but may also further drag the poor into drain of
poverty rather than prosperity. Political convenience for perpetuation of power
is the name of the game.